What Is the Phrase ‘Intricate Text’ in Grammarly?

What Is the Phrase 'Intricate Text' in Grammarly?
Share:

Grammarly can certainly offer many features to users. These features arenโ€™t only concerning the grammar, but rather the complete text, as well. One of these features is the use of intricate text in Grammarly. However, many people are confused by this term, as itโ€™s often thrown around within the app, but there are a lot of users who donโ€™t understand its meaning if itโ€™s harmful to the text or not, and what exactly is the meaning of the intricate text. So, what is the phrase โ€˜intricate textโ€™ in Grammarly?

Intricate text in Grammarly means that your text has a lot of subordinate clauses, parentheses, reverse verbs, adjectives, and adverbs. To keep it simple; Grammarlyโ€™s saying that your text may be too needlessly complex and that you should think about rewriting it to keep it simple.

This is actually a common issue in writing, as all writing should be focused on language economy (making your point with the least amount of words possible). In todayโ€™s article, weโ€™ll be looking into Grammarlyโ€™s point of the intricate text, what does it mean within the limits of Grammarly, what does it mean in general writing, is it good or bad and how can you fix it if thereโ€™s any fixing to be done. Letโ€™s get started.

What Is Intricate Text in Writing?

In writing, the intricate text means that your piece of writing is needlessly long and over-stylized. This isnโ€™t necessarily a bad thing, especially if youโ€™re not writing for academic purposes, but rather for creative purposes.

Intricate, by definition (look it up if you need to), literally means very complicated or detailed. For example โ€œan intricate network of canalsโ€

You have to realize that all writing is somewhat aimed at language economy, meaning that you should always try to make your statement with as few words as possible. This, however, isnโ€™t necessarily true when it comes to creative writing.

When youโ€™re writing creatively, be it poetry, fiction, nonfiction, or even a blog โ€“ you shouldnโ€™t restrict yourself to the language economy. True bookworms enjoy reading, and authors like Sir Arthur Conan Doyle are greatly enjoyed โ€“ his stories on Sherlock Holmes are great examples of incredibly descriptive writing establishing a perfect flow of adjectives that complement one another beautifully. If youโ€™re writing a novel, you should never enclose yourself within the limits of non-intricate text.

Weโ€™ll explain this with this example: say you saw a red car speeding down the street. You can say what you saw in an intricate and in a simple way.

The simple way: I saw a red car speeding down the street today.

The intricate way: Today, while I was walking down the street glistening in the eveningโ€™s delightful glow, Iโ€™ve accidentally gazed upon the saddened, grey pavement and noticed a loud, magnificent car, red like a burning glow, making its way with impressive pace down the street full of curious everyday bystanders, like a mechanical chariot of God, disappearing in the distance.

Youโ€™ve most likely noticed that the latter sentence is something youโ€™d most likely read in a book, while the former is a simple statement.

Intricate texts are somewhat frowned upon in the academic community (aside from quotes and giving examples) โ€“ this is because academic work should remain strict and to the point. Give your thesis, provide evidence. Anything other than that is very distracting and will likely lead the readerโ€™s mind away from the point of the text.

This is why intricate text is so closely related to the language economy, but they arenโ€™t exactly the same thing. When youโ€™re writing a novel, your goal is to tell a story, and if you want to tell the story of the red car, you need to make a statement about it. However, you also want your readers to enjoy it, and in order to enjoy it, the readers have to find your writing exciting, interesting, intriguing, suspenseful, beautifulโ€ฆthere are probably a million adjectives we could add on here.

So, while the text about the red car may be intricate, it certainly isnโ€™t breaking any language economy rules, as the goal is to both tell the story about the red car and tell it in an enjoyable way.

However, if weโ€™re taking a look at language economy within the limits of academic writing, then it becomes almost synonymous with non-intricate writing. Having a surplus of words in your writing is both needlessly intricate and breaks the laws of language economy.

All in all; if youโ€™re writing within academic capacity, you should definitely keep intricacy and language economy in mind, as many papers and articles get turned down for being too intricate and too stylized. If youโ€™re just trying to finish a piece of creative writing, then you shouldnโ€™t bother yourself with intricacy and language economy. There are creative writing services whose professional writers can help with such kinds of papers.

What Does Grammarly Mean By โ€˜Intricate Textโ€™?

The simple answer is that your sentence is freighted with too many subordinate clauses.

This isnโ€™t necessarily a bad thing โ€“ Grammarly isnโ€™t saying that you should immediately rewrite your work, just that you should take another look at it and consider simplifying it.

Grammarly doesnโ€™t take your whole text into account โ€“ it rather checks it sentence by sentence, so if youโ€™re writing a creative text you shouldnโ€™t worry about the intricate text warning, as Grammarly isnโ€™t a human being, and its algorithms donโ€™t understand that what youโ€™re doing isnโ€™t bound by the rules of language economy.

Itโ€™s just telling you to go for shorter and simpler sentences.

However, Grammarly is basing its opinion on the average reader. Now, we have no idea how Grammarly exactly developed their algorithms, as itโ€™s a secret, but just because Grammarlyโ€™s saying that somethingโ€™s intricate, doesnโ€™t necessarily mean that itโ€™s intricate. For example โ€“ even if you have a Ph.D. in the English language, reading Ulysses is going to be difficult for you as you will still find the writing intricate. Even if you read it a thousand times, youโ€™ll find it intricate. However, youโ€™ll probably find Dr. Doolittle pretty simple to read, while a six-year-old probably wonโ€™t.

In that, if youโ€™re an expert on philosophy, reading an academic article on metaphysics probably isnโ€™t too difficult for you. But even if the writing isnโ€™t intricate at all (and it canโ€™t be, itโ€™s an academic text (remember what we said about simplicity!), the terms may be specific, but the writing itself is simple), Grammarly will probably still label it as intricate text because of all the complicated terms used in that field. Thatโ€™s because Grammarlyโ€™s basing its judgment on the average reader, and itโ€™s saying โ€œHey, I’m an average reader and this is difficult for me.โ€

You should always keep that in mind when youโ€™re writing, just because Grammarlyโ€™s labeling your writing as intricate, doesnโ€™t really mean that it is intricate.

Make sure not to let this get to your head too much. Despite Grammarly not understanding context and that will probably remain its greatest fault โ€“ itโ€™s not a human proofreader โ€“ it will still notice intricacy where it really exists. You may understand your text completely, but this doesnโ€™t mean that Grammarly isnโ€™t right about its complexity. James Joyce most definitely knew what he was writing while he was working on Ulysses, and we can be certain that he intended to write such an intricate piece of text, but that still doesnโ€™t change the fact that itโ€™s the literal definition of intricacy, and that it would reach wider audiences if it werenโ€™t so intricate.

To put it all in a nutshell; donโ€™t let Grammarly bind you to a specific way of writing. Just because the algorithm is saying that your writing isnโ€™t optimized, doesnโ€™t mean that it really isnโ€™t โ€“ the algorithm canโ€™t understand the context or the style of writing, so you should always take its advice with a pinch of salt. However, donโ€™t be stubborn and insist that you know your writing perfectly and that you shouldnโ€™t rethink it.

We all want to finish with our writing as quickly as possible, but thereโ€™s no shame in taking a moment just to reread what you wrote and rethink it. If you realize that your writing doesnโ€™t need any touching up to do, then youโ€™ve only convinced yourself of your own writing quality. And if you decide that your writing really is too intricate and complex, it wonโ€™t be a problem for you to rewrite it in a better way.

Share:

Similar Posts